Every chance meeting is an appointment.
Pablo Neruda
In a previous posting, I wrote
about Kristina, a shy participant in a class I taught at UCLA. On that last night of class, Brad, another
student, thanked me for my work. He told
me that he had looked forward to every class and had learned a lot. But then he smiled and said these immortal
words: “I still don’t see why I should
have to change just to please people, so I’m not going to.”
With that one sentence, Brad
graciously assured me that he hadn’t “got” what the class was all about! My work is not premised in the belief that we
should change so as to please other people.
I’m not in the business of creating “people pleasers.” Rather, I’m in the business of showing people
how to be smart and strategic communicators.
Strategy. That’s the key
word.
The reason why we communicate is
get our needs met. At its optimal,
communicating is about mutual satisfaction.
While that’s not always possible––for a host of reasons––that doesn’t
mean it’s any less worthwhile a goal.
No one way of communicating fits
all scenarios. If you talk the same way
to every person you deal with, then you’re hitting a one-note and reducing your
chances for getting heard and understood.
I learned this the hard way (is
there really any other way?) early on in ministry when I was a priest. The summer after ordination I worked at a parish
on Long Island, N.Y.. A few days after
arriving, I was assigned the funeral of a long-time parishioner.
I’d never presided at a funeral, so
I was feeling nervous when I went to the funeral home for the viewing the night
before the service. I didn’t know the
deceased or his family, so what could I say to them without sounding like a
walking cliché?
The funeral director informed me
that the deceased was survived by his three adult daughters. That’s all he told me and I was too inexperienced
to ask him any questions.
So, I entered the viewing room and
spotted three beautiful, blonde-haired women near the casket, who looked like
they could have walked off the set of Sex and The City!
I went over to one of the sisters, extended
my hand, and in what ended up being a clichéd, somber tone of voice said, “I’m so sorry for your loss; I can’t imagine how hard a time this must be for you
all.” The woman smiled and with a
wave of her hand said, “Thank you, but
that’s okay. Actually, he was a mean
s.o.b. and we’re all happy to see him go!”
Well, she put me in my place––and
taught me a pivotal lesson. I’d gone to
the viewing on autopilot and didn’t strategize.
I presumed that because it was a funeral, and the people I directly was
dealing with were family, that my goal was to comfort them. But, they didn’t want my sympathy and didn’t
need my comfort.
I learned that just because a
certain context calls for a presumed emotion, that doesn’t mean the person(s)
involved is going to be feeling that specific way. In practical terms, I learned to first go to
the funeral director and ask for a reading of the “emotional temperature” in a
room, so as to gauge my words and demeanor.
All good communication is about
strategizing, which means it’s important to consider these three
questions: Who’s involved? What’s the
context? What’s my goal? Answer these questions and you can then
strategize how you’re going to approach someone.
This is true in our personal lives
and equally true in business where the stakes are high.
Therefore, your primary goal isn’t
to please people. Rather, it’s to create
a mutually satisfying (i.e. beneficial) relationship. And that’s done by figuring out how to
communicate with the other person in a way that makes it as easy as possible
for her or for him to hear and understand you.
Only then can our goals have the chance to be mutually
satisfied.
No comments:
Post a Comment