Last week a couple met with me to
explore communications coaching. Cathy admitted
that she didn’t feel a need for coaching (it was Jack’s idea to meet with me).
Everything’s good in how they talk—though at times, she said, she “might” be a
bit too passive in their arguments—especially when he becomes “his usual
pigheaded” self! Hmm. . .
Jack readily admitted that he’s
competitive and enjoys arguing even when he knows he’s wrong. This is
true even with Cathy.
I asked if she enjoyed arguing with
him when he was in the “zone.” She didn’t—she hated it. But, she
said it didn’t matter as she just shuts down and lets him have his way.
Jack jumped in, saying that he hated
it when she shut down. I asked if he
heard why she shuts down. Yes, but. . .
“Then why do you do it?” Cathy
demanded. “I don’t know,” he said, shrugging his shoulders. “I don’t want to argue. All I want is
to get what I want,” Cathy matter-of-factly explained.
“There, that’s the kind of attitude
I don’t like. I feel like she’s disrespecting me,” said Jack. “She
doesn’t take what I say seriously. I explain things logically to
her. I give her the reasons why we need to do something a certain way and
she ignores everything I say.”
“Is that true?” I asked. “Do
you ignore? Do you intend to disrespect him?”
“I know what he’s going to say—I
just don’t want to hear it. I don’t want to know the reasons why I can’t
have something when I feel I should have it. The problem is he thinks
with his head and I think with my heart. He doesn’t respect me when he
doesn’t listen to why I want something.”
Exasperated, Jack, tossed out, “she
doesn’t have any reasons for anything. All she has are just feelings.”
Let me freeze frame here—does any of
this sound familiar? I want to point out that Jack and Cathy were very
polite in the way they spoke to each other—this wasn’t a shouting match.
However, they clearly felt frustrated.
So, let me try to distill an hour
and a half conversation into some manageable thoughts.
Studies show that the most
successful relationships are the ones where the couple is similar enough that
they comfortingly compliment each other and different enough that they
invitingly challenge each other.
Now this is certainly true with this
couple. By dint of personality and profession (engineer) Jack values
logic. Cathy is a person, by dint of personality and profession (sales),
who values feelings. He spots specifics and she stares at the panorama.
He thinks logic is going to win the
day because that is how logic is supposed to work. However, as soon as
she begins to feel that he’s clobbering her with facts, she shuts down.
“What’s the use? He’s not interested in what I have to say” is her
mantra. And he becomes frustrated when he sees her give up. He
wants her to fight for her ideas. He’s a competitor and that’s what
competitors do!
They’ve created dance steps,
patterns, rituals for arguing and those steps are now like the air they
breathe. They presume, “well, that’s just the way we are.” Hmm––not
exactly.
I asked Jack, “when you’re in an
argument, do you notice that she’s becoming more passive?” “Yes.”
“Then, why do you persist?” “I want her to see it my way.” “Does she
ever come out of her passive state and say, ‘you’re right—I wasn’t thinking
straight.’” “No.” “Never? Then why do you persist?”
And I asked Cathy, “in an argument,
what’s your goal?” “To get what I want.” “And how do you do
that?” “I plead and then when I get frustrated, I just ask, ‘what do I
have to do to get X?” “And do you ask in a pleasant tone of voice or do
you have attitude?”
Smiles all around.
“Do you pout; cross your arms, and
make it sound like a demand if not an ultimatum?” She actually looked shocked that I knew!
80% of what we respond to in a
conversation is not what is said, but how it is said. She tuned him out
when he started to lecture. He tuned her out when she started to pout. No one likes a know-it-all and no one likes a
whiner.
So, what to do? It’s not
possible to magically change personality. Nor is there any reason to do
so.
Choices
can be made in how to communicate.
She needs to understand that
“because it feels good” is not a reason that is going to advance her
cause. How do you respond to a “reason” like that?
He needs to understand that people
don’t always make decisions based on what is most logical. He needs to
help her explore her feelings so as to help her understand what she is
thinking. And, she needs to help him explore his thoughts so as to help
him understand what he’s feeling.
They each need to help the other
understand what it is they individually want and explain why they want what
they want. Together, they need to want
to find new ways of having conversations.
Life is seldom lived at the
extremes—it’s lived in the messiness of the middle—and the middle is made up of
both thoughts and feelings.
No comments:
Post a Comment